
Greenpeace Africa, the Kenya Peasants League, and BIBA Kenya have welcomed the recent landmark ruling by the Court of Appeal, which temporarily halts the importation of genetically modified (GM) crops into Kenya. Speaking at a joint press conference in Nairobi, the organizations lauded the decision as a critical victory for farmers’ rights and food sovereignty, especially as the country approaches a crucial seed litigation case in May.
Elizabeth Atieno, Greenpeace Africa’s Food Sovereignty Campaign Lead, praised the ruling as a triumph for Kenyan farmers and consumers, emphasizing that the temporary halt on GMO imports provides an opportunity to reassess agricultural policies, promote agroecological solutions, and focus on securing strong legal protections for farmer-managed seed systems in the upcoming May litigation.
“This case is not just about farmers; it affects every Kenyan. When farmers lose control over seeds, we all lose. We lose access to diverse, healthy, and affordable food. We lose our ability to adapt to climate change. We lose the rich biodiversity that has sustained our food systems for centuries,” added Atieno.
Ann Maina of the Biodiversity and Biosafety Association (BIBA Kenya) emphasized the threat posed by corporate seed monopolies, stating that the struggle for seed sovereignty is a battle against corporate control over livelihoods and food systems. She expressed that the decision is not only a victory for farmers but also a reaffirmation of their rights to save and exchange seeds without interference. Maina stressed that farmers must have control over their seeds, which form the essential foundation of the food supply, and noted that farmer-managed seed systems have sustained communities for generations. She warned against allowing corporate interests to monopolize seed heritage and compromise food sovereignty.
“GMOs are presented as a quick-fix solution to hunger, but in reality, they create more problems than they claim to solve. They are not introduced in isolation; they come with a reliance on chemical pesticides and fertilizers, creating a cycle where farmers must continuously invest in costly inputs to maintain yields,” warned Maina.
Cidi Otieno from the Kenya Peasants League highlighted the significance of the upcoming case, stating that the seed litigation case in May will be crucial in determining the future of Kenya’s food systems. He explained that they are fighting not only against GMOs but also for the protection of indigenous seed varieties, farmers’ rights to save and exchange seeds, and the preservation of agricultural biodiversity. He emphasized that the struggle is about securing food sovereignty for generations to come.
A farmer representative expressed concerns, stating that farmers are the custodians of seeds and food systems and warning that if laws criminalize their right to save and exchange seeds, they will be forced into permanent dependency on multinational corporations. The representative emphasized that farmer-managed seed systems are climate-resilient, cost-effective, and culturally significant, and called for laws that recognize and protect them.
The conference highlighted agroecology as a viable, farmer-centered alternative to GMOs. Advocates stressed the importance of agroecology in promoting biodiversity, restoring soil health, and enhancing climate resilience while safeguarding farmers’ rights to seed sovereignty.
Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal issued an order blocking the government from taking any further action to permit the importation of genetically modified (GMO) crops and foods into the country.
Appellate judges Patrick Kiage, Weldon Korir, and Joel Ngugi issued the order following an appeal filed by advocate Paul Mwangi and the Kenya Peasants League.